So long as people do not infringe upon other peoples rights to the property they own, a truly free humanity ultimately has to allow all the worlds people the freedom to live and work wherever they so choose.
If people are wanting to migrate it is because they seek 'advantage' and often that advantage is state welfare (tax-payer money taken by use of force and redistributed without approval), often it is that migrants will work for lower wages than the state imposed legal minimum dictates, often it is to escape the failings of the state from which they come.
A world without states would not have guards, fences and prisons for people who were born in one place just defined by lines on a map and controlled by people who simply pronounce it is they who are in control and so only they can wear the special hats!
And before too long the economy would settle, by a simple process of natural attrition, like a woodland can manage itself, a river workout the way to the sea, a bird learn to fly on the windiest of days.
The natural world does not need organising, by people in special hats, it can look-after itself and, when allowed to do so, quickly finds the optimum manner and with beautifully efficiency but yet breathtaking complexity too.
I am not saying we have to 'return to nature' or such - we must continue to advance. I am saying that we need to rediscover how to only allow all human macro-systems to dictate - roots-up - the structures of our global society.
We need the confidence to shrug-off the burden of our belief in omnipotent rulers being necessary, a paradigm remaining that is nothing but an ugly vestige of the past.
Sure it would be difficult to just open the world's boarders 'snap'!" - but we will have to rapidly evolve to this nirvana because, no matter how many rules and systems we impose, the concept of the state is failing. The state will eventually, can only but, fall as dust through our fingers no matter how much we think we have no better option or want to believe.
Friday, 19 April 2013
The State: An Inherently Psychopathic System.
If every leader, political and corporate, was totally accountable for
their each-and-every action the world would be a different and better
place. For one thing: no sane person would leave themselves open to
such liabilities. For another: nobody could legitimately rise to such a
position because the potential liabilities would exceed anybody’s
ability to atone.
Why is it that the vast majority think we need a world where the few are expected to operate in such capacities; roles which clearly far exceed any person’s ability to atone. It is madness, it is the false paradigm within which the world is currently lost. It surely is one clear reason why people in such positions of power do, so frequently, abuse their office in so many ways; they know they never can be really called upon to atone for their actions.
A fellow who truly accepted full liability for every aspect of their tenure would have to act with great caution; but I fear persons of such qualities do not often rise to any such position.
By an almost inverted process of exclusion, those who manage to make it to be our leaders are most likely to be the least suitable. Indeed if one imagines how leaders would match against the Hare Psychopathy Check-list, for example, the conclusion is striking:
Factor 1: Personality “Aggressive narcissism”
Glibness/superficial charm
Grandiose sense of self-worth
Pathological lying
Cunning/manipulative
Lack of remorse or guilt
Shallow affect (genuine emotion is short-lived and egocentric)
Callousness; lack of empathy
Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
Factor 2: Case history “Socially deviant lifestyle”
Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
Parasitic lifestyle
Poor behavioural control
Lack of realistic long-term goals
Impulsiveness
Irresponsibility
Juvenile delinquency
Early behaviour problems
Revocation of conditional release
Traits not correlated with either factor
Promiscuous sexual behaviour
Many short-term marital relationships
Criminal versatility
Acquired behavioural sociopathy/sociological conditioning
The mechanisms by which those who function within the state can be called upon to atone are the very mechanisms of that selfsame entity. That is why there is minimal opportunity for traction in such an endeavour; its their game which they need only play with their stacked deck and loaded dice.
All the while we accept the state we will be subjected to a system that can only inflict psychopaths onto the people. The system is inherently psychopathic.
To want to employ the state’s systems, to correct the inevitably undesirable actions of the state and its agents, only acts to endorses the very system that is erroneous by it nature, by its every dynamic.
People like Hitler, Mussolini, Churchill, Bush and Blair are not the problem, they are a symptom. The disease is the state and such failed leaders are but one clearly evident pustule manifestation of the wretchedness it only creates.
Are we alone in realising these truths and our political masters all blind and foolish. I think not, not at all. If we can work it out the state’s police and security apparatus surely can too; let alone the various official enquiries.
Since I awoke, following 9/11, to the endless lies fed to the people, I have undergone a metamorphic transformation; a slow but complete reformation.
I believe I now can see our enemy, formed as Trompe-l’œil, shifting; one moment visible and the next the illusion.
My conclusion is not that the concept of the state is just broken and needs to be fixed. It is that the illusion of the state, including the notion of democracy, is nothing but a hollow sham to hold mankind stupefied into slavery. The state works fine at what it truly intended for.
Take for poignant example whosoever it really is that has such vast financial resources sufficient to to lend so copiously to governments to break them, then yet more to bail them out and more still to break them even harder yet again. How will these people fare without their multi-layered control apparatus, woven into and including the state, to do their bidding? How will they do when control of the means of exchange is no longer in the hands of their false edifice called state?
The first battle is within ourselves. It is to cast-off the belief, the belief that the state is a necessary enterprise at all. Every function of normal decent human existence and progress can be enacted without its central control; more effectively I will argue. The authority of the state will always be usurped by the few at the expense of the many.
Why is it that the vast majority think we need a world where the few are expected to operate in such capacities; roles which clearly far exceed any person’s ability to atone. It is madness, it is the false paradigm within which the world is currently lost. It surely is one clear reason why people in such positions of power do, so frequently, abuse their office in so many ways; they know they never can be really called upon to atone for their actions.
A fellow who truly accepted full liability for every aspect of their tenure would have to act with great caution; but I fear persons of such qualities do not often rise to any such position.
By an almost inverted process of exclusion, those who manage to make it to be our leaders are most likely to be the least suitable. Indeed if one imagines how leaders would match against the Hare Psychopathy Check-list, for example, the conclusion is striking:
Factor 1: Personality “Aggressive narcissism”
Glibness/superficial charm
Grandiose sense of self-worth
Pathological lying
Cunning/manipulative
Lack of remorse or guilt
Shallow affect (genuine emotion is short-lived and egocentric)
Callousness; lack of empathy
Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
Factor 2: Case history “Socially deviant lifestyle”
Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
Parasitic lifestyle
Poor behavioural control
Lack of realistic long-term goals
Impulsiveness
Irresponsibility
Juvenile delinquency
Early behaviour problems
Revocation of conditional release
Traits not correlated with either factor
Promiscuous sexual behaviour
Many short-term marital relationships
Criminal versatility
Acquired behavioural sociopathy/sociological conditioning
The mechanisms by which those who function within the state can be called upon to atone are the very mechanisms of that selfsame entity. That is why there is minimal opportunity for traction in such an endeavour; its their game which they need only play with their stacked deck and loaded dice.
All the while we accept the state we will be subjected to a system that can only inflict psychopaths onto the people. The system is inherently psychopathic.
To want to employ the state’s systems, to correct the inevitably undesirable actions of the state and its agents, only acts to endorses the very system that is erroneous by it nature, by its every dynamic.
People like Hitler, Mussolini, Churchill, Bush and Blair are not the problem, they are a symptom. The disease is the state and such failed leaders are but one clearly evident pustule manifestation of the wretchedness it only creates.
Are we alone in realising these truths and our political masters all blind and foolish. I think not, not at all. If we can work it out the state’s police and security apparatus surely can too; let alone the various official enquiries.
Since I awoke, following 9/11, to the endless lies fed to the people, I have undergone a metamorphic transformation; a slow but complete reformation.
I believe I now can see our enemy, formed as Trompe-l’œil, shifting; one moment visible and the next the illusion.
My conclusion is not that the concept of the state is just broken and needs to be fixed. It is that the illusion of the state, including the notion of democracy, is nothing but a hollow sham to hold mankind stupefied into slavery. The state works fine at what it truly intended for.
Take for poignant example whosoever it really is that has such vast financial resources sufficient to to lend so copiously to governments to break them, then yet more to bail them out and more still to break them even harder yet again. How will these people fare without their multi-layered control apparatus, woven into and including the state, to do their bidding? How will they do when control of the means of exchange is no longer in the hands of their false edifice called state?
The first battle is within ourselves. It is to cast-off the belief, the belief that the state is a necessary enterprise at all. Every function of normal decent human existence and progress can be enacted without its central control; more effectively I will argue. The authority of the state will always be usurped by the few at the expense of the many.
Wednesday, 20 March 2013
Bank of England warn quantitative easing could lead to “unwarranted depreciation of sterling”
I did not appoint these fools. I did not sign-up for this. But it looks like I'll have to suffer the consequences of their actions.
When you have an unlimited and growing financial liability to which it can be demanded that you yield - with all the 'authority' of a government by way of its absolute powers of taxation and force - you are extremely exposed. Nobody in their right mind would accept such a liability willingly.
This so called 'quantitative easing' can only lead to “a depreciation of sterling”. That is obvious. The only reason depreciation would not be apparent is if every other currency is being produced at the same rate or there is seen to be an equivalent growth of value of the specific money producing nation's total economic resource.
The situation is clearly the former: depreciation is not so apparent, with sterling yet, because most other major currencies are being produced at a similar rate. But that does not mean the value of money is not falling, it just means the value of these currencies are all falling simultaneously (like an ill equipped international school of bungee-jumping).
And still inflation is not yet so intensely evident. Why? Because of deflation in so many market sectors due simply to the generally failing economy. There is no scope to increase prices of any kind of goods and services which folk feel they can, if need be, do without (because the market is so soft, disposable income so thin, without they will do).
I did not sign-off for this maybe but categorically my kids did not in any way and so if you are born into debt that is indentured servitude or, put it another-way, slavery; TAX SLAVERY! And so it is. We are the HUMAN-TAX-HERD and this place we foolishly thought of as being 'our country' is nothing of the sort. It is a giant TAX-FARM.
Who the beneficial owners are is not so clear - I say "follow the money". But our 'democratically elected' squad of muppits are just a foil of fake accountability and their boundless army of public sector money eaters just give them a virtually guaranteed mandate. Belief in the necessity of 'The State' (of any kind or form) is the most persistent and dangerous superstitious illusion of which I am now thankfully utterly free.
When you have an unlimited and growing financial liability to which it can be demanded that you yield - with all the 'authority' of a government by way of its absolute powers of taxation and force - you are extremely exposed. Nobody in their right mind would accept such a liability willingly.
This so called 'quantitative easing' can only lead to “a depreciation of sterling”. That is obvious. The only reason depreciation would not be apparent is if every other currency is being produced at the same rate or there is seen to be an equivalent growth of value of the specific money producing nation's total economic resource.
The situation is clearly the former: depreciation is not so apparent, with sterling yet, because most other major currencies are being produced at a similar rate. But that does not mean the value of money is not falling, it just means the value of these currencies are all falling simultaneously (like an ill equipped international school of bungee-jumping).
I did not sign-off for this maybe but categorically my kids did not in any way and so if you are born into debt that is indentured servitude or, put it another-way, slavery; TAX SLAVERY! And so it is. We are the HUMAN-TAX-HERD and this place we foolishly thought of as being 'our country' is nothing of the sort. It is a giant TAX-FARM.
Who the beneficial owners are is not so clear - I say "follow the money". But our 'democratically elected' squad of muppits are just a foil of fake accountability and their boundless army of public sector money eaters just give them a virtually guaranteed mandate. Belief in the necessity of 'The State' (of any kind or form) is the most persistent and dangerous superstitious illusion of which I am now thankfully utterly free.
Monday, 4 February 2013
The paradigm of the necessity of the state is false.
It would be nice to believe that our conundrums are simply the result of
ineffectiveness, inefficiency and incompetence alongside of greedy
capitalists taking advantage where they can. I do not think so.
I think, opposite to the apparent shambles being the result of poor planning and management, the slow death of the global economy results from a long-term global manipulation of central banks and the currencies they issue.
The so called 'political leaders' are bit-part patsies who are selected to go along or be destroyed. Democracy is a hollow sham devised to give the impression these people represent the interests of the plebiscite.
The desired outcome is to drive the current human-tax-slave tax-farms known as 'nations' into every deeper integration within a series of pan-continental unions and in turn drive those unions towards a single union of global governance; an ambition referred to, by our political masters, as the 'New World Order'.
Alongside of this is the necessity to draw the variety of currencies issued by this plethora of 'nation-state' tax-farms into similar pan-continental union currencies (the EURO the AMERO the AFRO etc), then represent their international transaction with a SDR based currency and eventually supplant all with a single global unified currency.
Conspiracy or Cock-up?
If everything that goes awry at the hands of government are just more and more cock-ups, please when do we declare the whole concept of the state a busted-flush - that it is a belief as muddled, deep-rooted but as wrong as that of religion (sorry bible bashers).
Or do we accept that the degeneration of so much, when so many great minds ponder endlessly upon all, is not all accidental but deliberate and failure is core to the perpetuation of the state; at which point we should too declare it to be a busted-flush.
The paradigm of the necessity of the state is false.
I think, opposite to the apparent shambles being the result of poor planning and management, the slow death of the global economy results from a long-term global manipulation of central banks and the currencies they issue.
The so called 'political leaders' are bit-part patsies who are selected to go along or be destroyed. Democracy is a hollow sham devised to give the impression these people represent the interests of the plebiscite.
The desired outcome is to drive the current human-tax-slave tax-farms known as 'nations' into every deeper integration within a series of pan-continental unions and in turn drive those unions towards a single union of global governance; an ambition referred to, by our political masters, as the 'New World Order'.
Alongside of this is the necessity to draw the variety of currencies issued by this plethora of 'nation-state' tax-farms into similar pan-continental union currencies (the EURO the AMERO the AFRO etc), then represent their international transaction with a SDR based currency and eventually supplant all with a single global unified currency.
Conspiracy or Cock-up?
If everything that goes awry at the hands of government are just more and more cock-ups, please when do we declare the whole concept of the state a busted-flush - that it is a belief as muddled, deep-rooted but as wrong as that of religion (sorry bible bashers).
Or do we accept that the degeneration of so much, when so many great minds ponder endlessly upon all, is not all accidental but deliberate and failure is core to the perpetuation of the state; at which point we should too declare it to be a busted-flush.
The paradigm of the necessity of the state is false.
Money - a mechanism of diminishing returns
If one looks at the value of the UKP, USD, EUR AUD & JPY over the last ten years against GOLD the trends are evident.
Not only have they fallen 80% in value over that period but they have, within a ferret's whisker, all faired much the same. The UKP and the USD have been tracking each-other since 2009 previously the UKP was tracking the EUR.
Since 2010 the JPY broke through the value of the EUR to be running closest to GOLD but still the whole basket is massively floundering against this measure.
Regardless of the notion that GOLD is the true fixed measure of value (and all currencies have been enormously depreciated against this base-line measure) the trend between the currencies shows there is little real variation (and they are all heading to hell).
The AUD has broken out a little retaining a stronger position in comparison over the last decade (decayed) but viewed over the last two decades this can be viewed as less pronounced too - just matching the JPY.
The JPY has recently been artificially weakened but this can be seen as a correction of the effect resulting from the Tsunami which appeared to cause the currency to strengthen as a result perhaps of converting overseas investments to fund reconstruction work.
I don't specifically recommend GOLD as being guaranteed to produce, over the next couple of decades, or continuance of this level of apparent growth or resistance to depreciation (though I would not mind gambling that it will). GOLD is as vulnerable to market manipulation as the currencies undoubtedly are. I just wish I had put my eggs into a precious basket!
I am (clearly?) illustrating that all currencies have depreciated at consistent levels with each-other and demonstrate that adjustments in this parity are, on reflection, small.
I do not agree that governments want inflation to 'stop people hoarding cash and stopping the economy'. A public that build-up reserves of cash under their beds is improbable if the banking system pays a viable rate of interest to stimulate investment with their deposit accounts.
I conject that inflation is driven by central banks, not directly by governments, and that it suits the producers of money that the money they produce falls in value - that is their profit. Inflation is a form of invisible taxation.
Money is a representation of value and so cannot be measured by itself only.
If balloons all leak air over time you cannot say my red balloon is unchanged just because your blue balloon has remained the same size as mine over the same period. Or is that all balloony!
You can right click and select 'open link in new tab' to see a large version of these charts
Since 2010 the JPY broke through the value of the EUR to be running closest to GOLD but still the whole basket is massively floundering against this measure.
Regardless of the notion that GOLD is the true fixed measure of value (and all currencies have been enormously depreciated against this base-line measure) the trend between the currencies shows there is little real variation (and they are all heading to hell).
The AUD has broken out a little retaining a stronger position in comparison over the last decade (decayed) but viewed over the last two decades this can be viewed as less pronounced too - just matching the JPY.
The JPY has recently been artificially weakened but this can be seen as a correction of the effect resulting from the Tsunami which appeared to cause the currency to strengthen as a result perhaps of converting overseas investments to fund reconstruction work.
I don't specifically recommend GOLD as being guaranteed to produce, over the next couple of decades, or continuance of this level of apparent growth or resistance to depreciation (though I would not mind gambling that it will). GOLD is as vulnerable to market manipulation as the currencies undoubtedly are. I just wish I had put my eggs into a precious basket!
I am (clearly?) illustrating that all currencies have depreciated at consistent levels with each-other and demonstrate that adjustments in this parity are, on reflection, small.
I do not agree that governments want inflation to 'stop people hoarding cash and stopping the economy'. A public that build-up reserves of cash under their beds is improbable if the banking system pays a viable rate of interest to stimulate investment with their deposit accounts.
I conject that inflation is driven by central banks, not directly by governments, and that it suits the producers of money that the money they produce falls in value - that is their profit. Inflation is a form of invisible taxation.
Money is a representation of value and so cannot be measured by itself only.
If balloons all leak air over time you cannot say my red balloon is unchanged just because your blue balloon has remained the same size as mine over the same period. Or is that all balloony!
Friday, 1 February 2013
Thursday, 17 January 2013
The sham of democracy
Att: Rt Hon Peter Bone MP
Dear Mr Bone
In Prime Minister's Question Time yesterday, sat next to you, the Prime Minister said "I do not think it would be right for Britain to have an in/out referendum today, because we would be giving the British people a false choice."
I do not understand what he means by 'a false choice'. The choice for ' in or out ' is genuine enough for me.
I have lost all faith in the process of 'government'. I consider it to be a sham supported only by false logic, weak rhetoric and an utterly pliant media.
I do not believe the true interests of the people living on these islands are represented by this or any other government likely to emerge. I believe the mantra to dissolve nation states into a soviet of pan-continental unions and onward towards an eventual global 'governance' union is the only one allowed any traction and that movement in that direction is inextricable - imposable to resist.
Yours truly
ЕС промывание мозгов
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The UK is a tax haven albeit one for the very rich and multinational companies. For the wealthiest 1% tax rates in the UK over recent decades have fallen. The highest rate of income tax in the UK was 60% in 1980 and soon it will be 45%. Corporation tax rates were more than 50% in 1980 and soon they will be 22%. National Insurance rates have gone up. The base on which income taxes are charged for those on lower earnings has been expanded, considerably. VAT was 12 1/2% in 1980 and now it is 20%.
That means the poorest have been paying more and more tax (and I want to see an end to that, the least able are paying for this haven). Conversely Non Domiciled Individuals can live the high-life in the UK drawing from their off-shore stash for a one-off annual fee to HMRC of £50,000 that allows these UK non-domiciled individuals to keep unlimited sums of money offshore and tax free or make tax-free remittances (including making tax-free investments into UK based companies).
Combined with other UK tax loopholes, non-doms and their families can hold large overseas bank deposits, share and property portfolios including holiday homes and pay very little or no UK tax.
This is the target at which the EU is aimed and this is the meat on which the City of London thrives. There is NO FUTURE for the City of London without this favourable tax environment, for the worlds wealthy, remaining open for business.
The EU will chip away at the tax-haven that is the UK - along with the efficient network of trustworthy tax-havens that operate in tandem with and under the UK's auspices (Channel Isles, Isle of Mann, Cayman Isles, Barbados, etc).
Remaining in the soviet that is the EU the City of London will, sooner than later, be left dead. The European nations want to hammer a wooden stake into the heart of this remaining and vital vestige of the Great Britain that once ruled a global empire.
And the reason why this one element of empire remains is because it is the complete and utter core mechanism that funded and profited from that empire. The mechanism however can still strive to profit without directly controlling an empire but it needs the right 'culture' on which to grow.