One thing is for sure: the EU € EURO single currency either was or was not created by fools. The EURO member nation states do not have the economic control mechanisms to prevent the occurrence - it is a car-park on a cliff full of cars with no handbrakes!
If we generously consider the EU economists were not all blithering idiots it must have been clear to them the current situation was indeed ultimately inevitable. In other-words this path to economic failure was deliberately planned.
WHY? The objective of the EU is, and always has been, ever deeper political integration, to dismantle the national sovereignty of the nation member states and build a federal EU soviet state. The EURO was one step to that goal but did not give the EU total control of the member-state’s economies - that would have been a ‘bridge too far’ at the time of establishing the currency.
So instead a deaf-ear was turned to those who proclaimed the eventual outcome could only be economic meltdown. Not because they were not right in the assertion but because this was actually the covert intention.
I am rather taken with the following video which goes far into explaining so much of what has happened to the EU economy:
- just for fun!
Friday, 10 December 2010
Caustic Deniers
Use of the term ‘climate deniers’ is a shallow and offensive rhetorical device employed to attempt to subliminally influence readers to draw together those who question the veracity of ‘man-made climate change’ alongside that of rampant neo-Nazis who do not accept any Jews at all were murdered in WWII - Holocaust Deniers.
As a matter of sensible precaution I strongly recommend when you spot such rhetoric you fact check every aspect of the item you are reading before you accept any part as meaningful or valid. Otherwise dismiss it as being propagandistic brainwashing.
For a further example of the pro-man-made global warming lobby’s thinking see:
This film was created by vastly successful director Richard Curtis and with the involvement of his ‘partner’ Emma Freud, great-granddaughter of psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud. Her younger brother, Matthew Freud, is the husband of Rupert Murdoch’s daughter Elisabeth Murdoch.
As a matter of sensible precaution I strongly recommend when you spot such rhetoric you fact check every aspect of the item you are reading before you accept any part as meaningful or valid. Otherwise dismiss it as being propagandistic brainwashing.
For a further example of the pro-man-made global warming lobby’s thinking see:
This film was created by vastly successful director Richard Curtis and with the involvement of his ‘partner’ Emma Freud, great-granddaughter of psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud. Her younger brother, Matthew Freud, is the husband of Rupert Murdoch’s daughter Elisabeth Murdoch.
Wednesday, 8 December 2010
Nuclear Energy’s Vital Role in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions - say it after me children
Many of the folk I know and meet are deeply concerned with the effects of the so called ‘greenhouse effect’ or ‘global warming’ or its more recent title ‘climate change’. I do not share their conviction that climate change, if it is occurring at the rates reported, is as a direct result of man made CO2 emissions.
I remember learning in school history lessons that people used to hold fairs on the frozen river Thames in Tudor times, that the Romans grew grapes in York and even against Hadrian’s Wall between England and the wild tribes of today’s Scotland. Where Britain now stands has been both tropical and under ice sheets. Climate changes I do not deny. A warming climate may produce higher historically recorded levels of CO2 as a result of increased vegetation.
I reckon that a majority of those most deeply concerned with the effect of man-made CO2 climate change are the same people who are generally concerned with the environment, wildlife, pollution, the squandering of natural resources, reduction of habitat and so on. This is my finding when I talk to such folk.
Those who are old enough to have formed opinions on such matters before the ‘man-made greenhouse climate global change warming’ paradigm took-off were previously, in the vast majority, all strongly anti nuclear-power yet are now, in the main, reluctantly accepting or even advocating it.
These CO2 warriors and worriers even support the plethora of ‘Carbon Taxes’ and ‘Carbon Trading’ that have been piggybacked in with the CO2 paradigm, (designed to keep governments and corporates on side with a package of benefit for them too).
Accept or not my assertion CO2 warming is a fake, public support for nuclear energy has reached a record high as policy leaders voice the ‘need’ for new nuclear power plants.
See report: http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/publications..........
That has not occurred because people are now convinced nuclear power is clean and green but rather because they are told it does not contribute to global warming. Such is the power of propaganda to brainwashing the people of the world.
I remember learning in school history lessons that people used to hold fairs on the frozen river Thames in Tudor times, that the Romans grew grapes in York and even against Hadrian’s Wall between England and the wild tribes of today’s Scotland. Where Britain now stands has been both tropical and under ice sheets. Climate changes I do not deny. A warming climate may produce higher historically recorded levels of CO2 as a result of increased vegetation.
I reckon that a majority of those most deeply concerned with the effect of man-made CO2 climate change are the same people who are generally concerned with the environment, wildlife, pollution, the squandering of natural resources, reduction of habitat and so on. This is my finding when I talk to such folk.
Those who are old enough to have formed opinions on such matters before the ‘man-made greenhouse climate global change warming’ paradigm took-off were previously, in the vast majority, all strongly anti nuclear-power yet are now, in the main, reluctantly accepting or even advocating it.
These CO2 warriors and worriers even support the plethora of ‘Carbon Taxes’ and ‘Carbon Trading’ that have been piggybacked in with the CO2 paradigm, (designed to keep governments and corporates on side with a package of benefit for them too).
Accept or not my assertion CO2 warming is a fake, public support for nuclear energy has reached a record high as policy leaders voice the ‘need’ for new nuclear power plants.
See report: http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/publications..........
That has not occurred because people are now convinced nuclear power is clean and green but rather because they are told it does not contribute to global warming. Such is the power of propaganda to brainwashing the people of the world.
1,2 & 3
First you are influenced, secondly you change and thirdly you influence. Its a knock-on effect.
We do not need a violent revolution to knock our world back on track. All we must do is assimilate verifiable facts, understand how matters come about and draw our own reasoned conclusions. When confident; express yourself clearly, communicate!
Do not allow your opinion to be formed by others. When sufficient of us start this process off we become an unstoppable force. Together we can change the world, individually it is a more daunting task.
Tuesday, 7 December 2010
Drip, drip, drop.
David Cameron continues the work of every other UK PM over the last 50 years. Devolving power in any direction away from Westminster, diluting the population through immigration and poor education, dissipating the United Kingdom.
The drive to the EU is but a staging-post before the formation of a system of global governance for a global plethora of desperate non-sovereign semi-autonomous regions. And the people are considered too stupid, too tribal, too territorial and too self-interested to understand to poetic allure of the ambition so hence they are to be kept in the dark and feed ****.
The drive to the EU is but a staging-post before the formation of a system of global governance for a global plethora of desperate non-sovereign semi-autonomous regions. And the people are considered too stupid, too tribal, too territorial and too self-interested to understand to poetic allure of the ambition so hence they are to be kept in the dark and feed ****.
Wiki, wiki, little bat! How I wonder what you're at.
I have noted over the last few weeks that Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales, of Wikipedia founding fame, has been prominently fronting a Wikipedia campaign seeking donations on a header added to every Wikipedia entry I have looked at. As the 'fountain of all knowledge' perhaps he has had the foresight and happy timing to clarify resoundingly that Wikipedia is NOT WikiLeaks and that he is NOT Julian Assange.
Julian Assange may appear to be being dragged around the floor as revenge for WikiLeaks' recent and ongoing US diplomatic cable leaks but these rape allegations have been ongoing for over three months - although he clearly appeared to be no friend of the US administration since before then too. Is Assange a victim of reprisal false allegations or honey trap?
Nothing WikiLeaks revealed yet has looked like a knock-out blow to this US administration or to its Bush/NeoCon predecessors. Indeed nothing has greatly tarnished the US diplomatic service or whispered squat-diddle of its uglier underbelly - the CIA. Funny that!
In a world of smoke and mirrors I would ignore the relevance and veracity or these cables or selection thereof. Even Assange's lawyer admitted on BBC News-Night that WikiLeaks were being careful to 'redact' details that may damage individual's security. (who, one may wonder, are they troubling to lookout for; Americans or everybody).
Bitter pills they may appear to be but every cable leaked so far can be seen also to assert the US view on the world, mostly at the expense of other leaders and nations.
If these documents had found their way directly into the hands of say a UK National newspaper they may have been resistant to publishing them. Now they know it would meet with the wrath of the US.
If independent news media publishers are confronted with leaked information to publish or whistle-blower's information, they too have now seen the writing on the wall. Indeed the US will use this episode to help them justify tighter controls of the internet.
As Franklin D. Roosevelt is attributed to have said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."
Julian Assange may appear to be being dragged around the floor as revenge for WikiLeaks' recent and ongoing US diplomatic cable leaks but these rape allegations have been ongoing for over three months - although he clearly appeared to be no friend of the US administration since before then too. Is Assange a victim of reprisal false allegations or honey trap?
Nothing WikiLeaks revealed yet has looked like a knock-out blow to this US administration or to its Bush/NeoCon predecessors. Indeed nothing has greatly tarnished the US diplomatic service or whispered squat-diddle of its uglier underbelly - the CIA. Funny that!
In a world of smoke and mirrors I would ignore the relevance and veracity or these cables or selection thereof. Even Assange's lawyer admitted on BBC News-Night that WikiLeaks were being careful to 'redact' details that may damage individual's security. (who, one may wonder, are they troubling to lookout for; Americans or everybody).
Bitter pills they may appear to be but every cable leaked so far can be seen also to assert the US view on the world, mostly at the expense of other leaders and nations.
If these documents had found their way directly into the hands of say a UK National newspaper they may have been resistant to publishing them. Now they know it would meet with the wrath of the US.
If independent news media publishers are confronted with leaked information to publish or whistle-blower's information, they too have now seen the writing on the wall. Indeed the US will use this episode to help them justify tighter controls of the internet.
As Franklin D. Roosevelt is attributed to have said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."
Monday, 6 December 2010
Kelly's death was not correctly examined by Lord Hutton
Without access to all the evidence and without witness testimony under oath; debating the cause and circumstance of Dr Kelly's death is not the matter of importance and indeed may serve as a distraction from the correct path to unequivocally establishing the truth. The point is that we still do not know what really happened with reasonable and correct certainty because the circumstances of Kelly's death were not correctly examined by Lord Hutton and yet his inquiry was used to supplant the process of the corners inquest, which was the correct mechanism but was not allowed to draw a conclusion.
Hutton usurped the inquest and then acted upon a prejudicial conclusion of suicide as though such a finding had already been correctly drawn. Lord Hutton certainly appears to have whitewash on his hands.
The people must demand nothing less than allowing a full coroner's inquest to draw a verdict. Continued denial of an inquest is most suspicious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)